Saturday, June 28, 2008

Hacking Democracy: HBO Documentary features HOWARD DEAN, DNC President










Watch the HBO Documentary for FREE:
http://freedocumentaries.org/theatre.php?filmid=234&id=1157&wh=1000x720

Electronic voting machines count about 87% of the votes cast in America today. But are they reliable? Are they safe from tampering? From a current congressional hearing to persistent media reports that suggest misuse of data and even outright fraud, concerns over the integrity of electronic voting are growing by the day. And if the voting process is not secure, neither is America's democracy. The timely, cautionary documentary HACKING DEMOCRACY exposes gaping holes in the security of America's electronic voting system.

In the 2000 presidential election, an electronic voting machine recorded minus 16,022 votes for Al Gore in Volusia County, Fla. While fraud was never proven, the faulty tally alerted computer scientists, politicians and everyday citizens to the very real possibility of computer hacking during elections.

In 2002, Seattle grandmother and writer Bev Harris asked officials in her county why they had acquired electronic touch screen systems for their elections. Unsatisfied with their explanation, she set out to learn about electronic voting machines on her own. In the course of her research, which unearthed hundreds of reported incidents of mishandled voting information, Harris stumbled across an "online library" of the Diebold Corporation, discovering a treasure trove of information about the inner-workings of the company's voting system.

Harris brought this proprietary "secret" information to computer security expert Dr. Avi Rubin of Johns Hopkins University, who determined that the software lacked the necessary security features to prevent tampering. Her subsequent investigation took her from the trash cans of Texas to the secretary of state of California and finally to Florida, where a "mini-election" to test the vulnerability of the memory cards used in electronic voting produced alarming results.

As the scope of her mission grew, Harris drew on the expertise of other computer- science experts, politicians and activists, among them: Andy Stephenson, candidate for secretary of state in Washington state; Susan Bernecker, Republican candidate in New Orleans; Kathleen Wynne, an activist from Cleveland; Dr. Herbert Thompson, chief security strategist, Security Innovation, Inc.; Ion Sancho, supervisor of elections for Leon County, Fla.; and Harri Hursti, a computer-security analyst. Academics, public officials and others seen in interview footage include: Deanie Lowe, supervisor of elections, Volusia County, Fla.; Mark Radke, marketing director of Diebold; David Cobb, presidential candidate, Green Party; and Rep. Stephanie Tubbs-Jones of Ohio.

Diebold software, or other software like it, is installed in thousands of counties across 32 states. David Dill, professor of computer science at Stanford, says the problem is that there are "lots of people involved in writing the software, and lots of people who could have touched the software before it went into that machine. If one of those people put something malicious in the software and it's distributed to all the machines, then that one person could be responsible for changing tens of thousands of votes, maybe even hundreds of thousands, across the country."

In Florida, Leon County supervisor of elections Ion Sancho presided over a trial "mini-election" to see if the vote could be hacked without being detected. Before votes were actually cast, computer analyst Harri Hursti "stuffed the ballot box" by entering votes on the computer's memory card. Then, after votes were cast, the results displayed when the same memory card was entered in the central tabulating program indicated that fraud was indeed possible. In other words, by accessing a memory card before an election, someone could change the results - a claim Diebold had denied was possible.

Ultimately, Bev Harris' research proved that the top-secret computerized systems counting the votes in America's public elections are not only fallible, but also vulnerable to undetectable hacking, from local school board contests to the presidential race. With the electronic voting machines of three companies - Diebold, ES&S and Sequoia - collectively responsible for around 80 percent of America's votes today, the stakes for democracy are high.

One of the executive producers of HACKING DEMOCRACY is Sarah Teale, whose previous HBO credits include "Dealing Dogs" and "Bellevue: Inside Out."

HACKING DEMOCRACY was directed by Simon Ardizzone and Russell Michaels; produced by Simon Ardizzone, Robert Carrillo Cohen and Russell Michaels; executive producers, Earl Katz, Sarah Teale and Sian Edwards; edited by Sasha Zik. For HBO: supervising producer, John Hoffman; executive producer, Sheila Nevins.

CHANGE has NO HOPE for UNITY

As a PROUD LIBERAL DEMOCRAT, I thank you for posting. It's tough to get behind the UNITY bandwagon, when it keeps CHANGE-ing direction!

I want "CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN" but I'm not sure that a CHANGE of positions on Election Financing, or Gun Control, Or.... INSERT CHANGE HERE... is the best way to unite us.

HELP! Trying to be a good Democrat and be supportive.

But, if we are changing what it means to be a Democrat, then CHANGE has NO HOPE for UNITY.

I recommend everyone join the BarackObama.com website. Read the posts. Reply to the posts. Don't just sit back and watch as our Party is being watered down and made lukewarm.

Unity Comes with a $30-million Price Tag

So I've been sitting back and watching, listening, reading. I see lots of calls for unity. Lots of politicking. Lots of trying to make us believe. I hear lots of Obama supporters on talk radio saying to hell with Hillary, kick her when she's out. A bunch of good Democrats, I'm sure, who would probabaly be on her side if the race had gone the other way.

The Obamas need Clinton to get on the bus. The fee is pretty hefty. But it's a price that must be paid. Just do it. Pay it off. Have your friends pay it off. Kill the story. Move on. Kiss and be nice. Be a better person.

Obama's right, she is a fighter. She will be his best ally. That comes with a $30-million guarantee!

Ass kissing isn't always left up to the loser. Because in this case, the losers don't really think they have lost. And there's a 18-million votes in evidence they didn't. Michelle had it right this week. She's about to join the girls club and she'd better start acting like one.

I'ts not ironic to me that Hillary has to "play nice" at this point. She's a skilled politician. She's a devoted Democrat. What is so ironic to me that for the past 16-months the Obamas have been TRASHING her. And now this week THEY are the ones singing her praises. Saying ALL of the things we all know to be the truth. That she rocks.

Good Democrats like myself will remain Good Democrats. I just hope that all this talk of Unity doesn't forget that one of our own, Joe Lieberman, was once our Vice Presidential Nominee. And as I look at the latest news stories about Obama "moving to the center" I worry that we are forgetting what it means to be a Liberal and what it means to be a Democrat.

Vero Possumus: Yes We Can? Since when is LATIN inclusive?


I, for one, am not liking that new "Presidential Seal" that the Obama campaign has unveiled.

While I do not think that Bush is a great president, I have the utmost respect for our government and for the Office of the President.

And since when does using LATIN make us more inclusive? Educated snobbishness? Perhaps.

Do we need to resort to using the Presidential Seal BEFORE we are in office in order to prove "we can"? No.

I now hear they've dropped the logo.

Obama Campaign Manager: Florida/Ohio Aren't Necessary! WHAT???

According to CNN.com, Plouffe said that contrary to popular belief, victory in Ohio and Florida isn't necessary to reach 270 but that they would "fight like heck" for the pair.

He pointed to two previously solid Republican states - North Carolina and Virginia - as examples of states they think can be turned blue, saying they plan to put some of their best staff there and if they win either on top of the Kerry states and Iowa, it's "game, set, match."

As a North Carolinian, I applaud Plouffe's inclusion of NC in his analysis and battleground, but is he seriously suggesting that we should forget about Florida and/or Ohio?

Pelosi sells your Civil Rights

Dems cut surveillance deal with White House
Phone companies to get immunity while Congress would get more oversight

Read the article:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25375118/

Democrats helping Democrats: Clinton's Debt

It's a longstanding tradition for winning campaigns to pay off the debt of other rivals in the primaries. To make it seem like Obama is magnanimous in asking supporters to do this for Clinton is absurd. Another media hyped story which is fodder and not news.

Excerpt from MSNBC: Obama's finance team has expanded since he secured the nomination earlier this month, providing a broad base of potential assistance to Clinton. At least 200 fundraisers attended the campaign's national finance meeting in Chicago last week. Scores were unable to attend, one participant said.

In urging his top fundraisers to help Clinton, Obama was counting on them to seek out their pool of donors to raise the money in large increments. Donors who have not contributed to Clinton's campaign could give up to $2,300 to help her pay off her debts.

It remained to be seen whether Obama would make a similar appeal to his Internet donors, a vast network of small-dollar contributors who helped Obama shatter fundraising records during the primary contests. As of the end of May, Obama had raised more than $287 million.

DNC.org No Longer Calls Obama "Democratic Nominee"

In response to my letter to the DNC on 6/14/2008. You will note that the DNC.org / Democrats.org website no longer refers to Barack Obama as the Democratic Nominee. Here is my letter:

As a delegate to the National Convention in August, I take issue with the opening page of the Democrats.org site calling Barack Obama the "Democratic Party Nominee". Did I vote at the DNC Convention in August 2008 already? How is Barack Obama named the nominee without the delegate's official vote? You may call him the "presumptive nominee" but according to the Rules and Bylaws, he is not yet the official nominee, the delegates have not voted. Please respond to my email in a timely manner and correct the website, and also issue a statement retracting your pronouncement of his nomination on the website.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

I find myself having to defend B.O.


Bio on Dr. Richard Land.

My letter to the Southern Baptist Convention:

I recently read Dr. Land's quote on msn.com's Election Guide (June 11, 2008): "What I hear from people is … 'I would rather have a third-rate fireman than a first-class arsonist.' And they view Obama as a first-class arsonist."— Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Convention Ethics and Religious Liberties Commission, on what Southern Baptists think of Sen. John McCain".

As a lifelong Southern Baptist, the son of a Southern Baptist ministers (who now serve on the mission field), I find it disappointing that Dr. Land has allowed his standing in the SBC to be used in a way which serves to divide the church on the basis of politics and to denegrade a fellow Christian. All Southern Baptists do not espouse the views which Dr. Land has presented.

These days, the message I hear from Democrats seem more and more in line with the teachings of Christ, who called us all to love. While the message I hear from Republicans is more and more one of hatred and division. Being Christ-like does not necessitate being a Republican, nor voting for one.

The SBC Leadership should be careful not to allow its leaders to cause our demonition to be seen as bigots, racists and blind fools.

While I personally do not agree with all of Barack Obama's political beliefs, he is a Christian. Allowing the SBC's name to be used in connection with Dr. Land's characterization of Sen. Obama as a "first-class arsonist" is reprehensible and deserves an apology and retraction on behalf of Southern Baptists such as myself who do not share this view.

Tuesday, June 10, 2008

When will they admit?